The education system provides
opportunities for students identified as struggling readers to achieve academic
success by training teachers on different instructional methods and approaches
to contribute and gauge students reading growth. Instruction and assessment are
operating partners contributing to developing students reading comprehension
skills. As reading is the basis for mastering all subsequent curricular areas,
it is the educator’s responsibility to implement classroom activities and teach
comprehension strategies to struggling readers. Response to Intervention (RTI) is
a term representing the variety of instructional and assessment strategies that
can be used with all students depending on their developmental needs.
(Afflerback, 2012). Throughout our text, detailed instructional methods and
well-functioning strategies are discussed to develop students as accomplished
readers.
RTI involves placing students based
on their developmental abilities and needs recognized by the classroom teacher.
If a student is able to successfully progress through the reading curriculum
they are placed in Tier 1. Tier 2 is available for students who have not
progress based on the expectations of Tier 1. Furthermore, struggling students
requiring more intensive instructional interventions and working with a reading
specialist are placed in Tier 3. Tier 3 focuses on specific needs for the
struggling reader, whether that’s vocabulary development, phonics awareness, fluency,
motivation, etc. A diagnostic assessment is conducted to address students
reading abilities and where to place them if they exhibit problematic areas needing
intervention. To ensure the at-risk student’s needs are being addressed, the
teacher monitors their progress and gauges how well they are progressing in
relation to their diagnostic results and curricular goals. (Afflerback, 2012).
RTI is an effective resource in recognizing the needs of a struggling student
and implementing the appropriate strategies and interventions to help them
become better readers.
Several of the assessments discussed
in our text require a substantial amount of training and professional
development. With that said, a significant amount of time is needed for these
interventions to be effective for students. “An assessment [is] designed to
yield information to inform our understanding of students’ present needs and
challenges and teachers’ related instruction,” (Afflerback, 2012). Furthermore,
each assessment focuses on particular reading skills based on the students
needs. Therefore, the validity of the assessments is based on different
conceptualizations. I feel that Afflerback teaches new educators the strategies
and appropriate interventions to focus on the identified problematic areas of
their students. However, it seems very challenging in the testing grades to be
able to follow curriculum and prepare a large sized, diverse student body for
testing when individualized instruction is needed for the struggling students. Dr.
Ken Robinson, a well-known author and educational expert, refers to himself as
a progressive viewed educator, opposing all traditional teaching methods. The
traditional model of teaching is to instruct material for our core academic
subjects that will be reflected on our state tests. This method of teaching can
prevent the opportunity for creating an engaging, interactive environment that
utilizes a blend of child-directed and teacher-directed curriculum. Without
building relationships in the classroom, there is no connection; there is no
school family. In my opinion this takes away the quality behind education. Our
student's are more than just peers among each other forced to participate in an
educational environment. They are young minds ready to be molded. They are
sponges, soaking in the information they are exposed to from their
environments.
In
conclusion, I feel that our students need to feel a connection amongst their
peers and with their teachers in order to thrive academically and discover a
love for learning. This can be done by diverse methods of teaching by recognizing
the needs of individual students through differentiated instruction that will
lead to comprehension skills, accomplished readers, furthermore academic
success.
References
Afflerbach, P. (2012). Understanding and using reading
assessment, K–12. International Reading Association.
Robinson, K. (2015). Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution That’s Transforming Education. Viking Publisher.
No comments:
Post a Comment